The notice points to 24 April as being the date of issue, but a once sealed letter bearing the stamp has been recorded, the letter being dated 11 April 1847.
The notice suggests, in quoting a price per 100, that perhaps the stamps were in sheets of 100. No multiple piece appears to be known, though single copies can be found showing traces of an adjoining stamp.
No details are known about who designed or printed the stamp, though the thick yellowish paper (and the colour of the ink) is similar to that of the 1852 printing of the Lithographs. This has led to suggestions that, notwithstanding the fine quality of the production, the stamp could have been prepared locally, and possibly that Charles Ptit could have been responsible for this issue as well as the Lithographs, since he was in the Caribbean at the time.
The stamp was undoubtedly lithographed, but the fineness of parts of the design suggests that the original die was engraved. The stamp is a remarkably fine production and the handsome deep blue colour combines to make it most attractive. Some copies can be found in paler shades but it is difficult to say if these are in their original colour. Some appear reasonably fresh, but others appear faded or treated in some way. For instance, a paler shade on entire of 30 August 1847, has a certificate stating that the stamp has been
“removed, treated and replaced ”.
Used copies may be found cancelled in one of three ways: The more usual is a pen-marked cross in the form of an ‘X’. Occasionally, copies are found more elaborately cancelled in ink, with, for example, a series of diagonal lines, or with a portion of the surface skimmed off, reminiscent of the early days in Afganistan. Copies also exist on entire, but without cancellation of any sort. Some so-called unused copies may well have come from such covers. The collector should beware of stamps with a pen-cancellation faded out masquerading as unused. It is perhaps worth mentioning that the pen-cancellations rarelytie the stamp to the cover.
There is next given, without comment, a reference which others may be able to follow up, but which so far appears to be an isolated one. In referring to Trinidad, Stanley Gibbons’ Monthly Journal of 31 May 1895 reports: “ Messrs. Cameron & Co. have shown us a letter from this Colony in which it is stated that the Governor, Sir Napier Broome, had ordered all the old stock of stamps, postcards, etc., to be destroyed. Amongst these things was the die of the old ‘Lady McLeod’ stamp, the destruction of which may be regretted; but when we learn that an American gentleman offered 3,000 for the die we cannot but feel that it is better out of the way.”. The letter adds: “His Excellency seems to be altogether opposed to philatelists and their works”. It is believed, on the contrary, that the hearty thanks of philatelists are due to Sir Napier Broome on this occasion for saving them from reprints of the Lady McLeod.
Collectors may like a comment on the availability of examples of the Lady McLeod. One or two of the big collections have contained several copies. The Caspary collection contained a single, the Hurlock collection one unused and four on cover, and the Charlton Henry collection one unused with gum, and four on cover. The relevant auction catalogues may be consulted for details. Apart from these, perhaps one or two copies are sold each year, but this is only a very rough guide. There is always keen competition for them, and even damaged copies fetch a high price. Genuinely unused or mint copies are of the utmost rarity. In view of the Taylor* find examples on entire or cover form a relatively high proportion of copies that have survived.
As regards the number of Lady McLeods now extant, originally it was thought to number 69, with the rider that the total could clearly be more than that – perhaps even double that figure. A census of all known Lady McLeod stamps, unused, used and on cover follows; this lists some 26 unused, 24 used and at least 39 on cover, some of which may be contrived.
Forgeries of the Lady McLeod do exist; records at the Royal Philatelic Society London show several including, rather unbelievably, a horizontal strip of 11!
In 1985 Dr. Peter Winter, from Bremen in the then West Germany, approached several museums and libraries in Europe that held philatelic collections. Amongst these was the British Library. He requested photographs of some of the more valuable items from the Tapling Collection and one of these was the Lady McLeod.
Several months later an advertisement, in the name of ‘ProPhilForum POC GmbH’, appeared in the philatelic press offering reproductions of classic rarities. Some of these reproductions were of those items photographed by the British Library, to whom copyright belonged and no permission to reproduce had been given.
The British Library subsequently took legal action against Dr. Winter and reached an out of Court settlement. The copies of the reproductions made from British Library images were destroyed, and some of the dies (including that used for the Lady McLeod) together with two sets of the reproductions were obtained as part of the settlement. One set has been kept by the Library and the second was presented to the Expert Committee of The Royal Philatelic Society London.
It is possible that, during this period, copies of the Lady McLeod stamp had been sold. These reproductions are very good and could possibly persuade the unwary that they were indeed genuine. They were stamped with the word ‘Reproduction’ on the back but this could easily be removed by an unscrupulous person.
Collectors are therefore warned not to purchase any Lady McLeod stamp or cover unless they are convinced as to its provenance or alternatively, obtain a certificate from a recognised Expert Committee.
* J. Graham Taylor was a collector resident in Trinidad who corresponded with Sir Edward Bacon (see BWI Handbook). It is from his firm’s correspondence that most of the entries came.